LearnAnyLanguage.com

What is AI?

Evidence-based answer · Last updated · How it’s made

The short answer

None of the provided sources define "What is AI? " in general terms — they are all research studies about how AI tools (chatbots, generative AI, AI tutoring systems) are used in language learning, especially English. So the honest, evidence-grounded answer here is not a definition of AI itself, but a picture of what AI-based tools do for English learners: they act as writing assistants, conversation/pronunciation partners, and feedback-and-tutoring systems, and research generally finds they help with motivation, engagement, and some skill gains, though effects on deeper learning outcomes are mixed.

Asked as someone learning English. Findings drawn from English-specific research are framed for English learners and may not hold for other languages; where the evidence is general second-language research, the report says so.

Sources describe AI as a learning tool, not a general concept

Every source given here is a study of AI applied to language teaching (chatbots, generative AI writing tools, AI tutoring systems) rather than a general explanation of what artificial intelligence is as a technology or field.2,4,6,8,9

AI chatbots take on several concrete roles in English learning

Across studies, AI tools are used mainly as: a writing assistant (grammar-checking, brainstorming, proofreading), a speaking/pronunciation tutor (real-time feedback on pronunciation and fluency), a conversation partner for practicing dialogue and pragmatics (like polite phrasing), and a lesson-planning aid for teachers.2,6,9

Example

For example, apps like ELSA Speak give learners instant feedback on pronunciation and intonation, while ChatGPT is used to brainstorm essay ideas or check grammar.

Learners self-report gains across several skills

In a systematic review of 56 studies on AI chatbots in English teaching, learners and teachers reported positive impact on writing skills, grammar and vocabulary, speaking, motivation, and self-directed learning, with writing skills showing the highest reported positive impact (92% of relevant studies).2

Meta-analysis finds a moderate-to-large positive effect on second-language acquisition

A meta-analysis pooling 41 studies and over 3,500 participants found that generative AI chatbots had a moderate-to-large positive effect on second-language learning outcomes overall, though the size of the benefit varied depending on factors like the learners' native language, the specific chatbot used, and how long the intervention lasted.8

In plain terms

'Second-language acquisition' (SLA) is the academic term for the process of learning a language that isn't your first language.

AI feedback on writing performs comparably to human tutor feedback

A controlled study comparing ChatGPT-generated writing feedback to feedback from a human tutor over six weeks found no difference in learning outcomes between the two, and when students were asked to compare the two types of feedback, opinions were split roughly evenly, with each having distinct strengths.7

Motivation and enjoyment are boosted more reliably than measurable skill gains

Several studies of English learners using AI outside class found that AI use significantly increased learners' enjoyment and sense of a positive future self as an English speaker, but did not always translate into measurable gains in confidence in actual speaking ability; one study found no significant effect of AI-based informal learning on students' self-reported speaking self-efficacy.1,5,10

AI anxiety can undermine engagement

Some studies found that anxiety about AI itself — worry about keeping up with fast-changing tools or about being replaced or judged by them — can reduce learners' and teachers' willingness to use AI and can weaken their motivation toward language learning.1

In plain terms

'AAL' (AI anxiety) refers to this specific stress or apprehension people feel about interacting with or relying on AI systems.

Structured grammar practice with AI shows short-term gains

A two-week classroom study with Saudi English learners found that a group who used ChatGPT alongside their teacher improved their grammar test scores significantly more than a group taught by traditional classroom methods alone.11

AI use is more effective when combined with teacher guidance

Studies of AI-assisted speaking assessment and peer feedback tools found the best learning results when AI was paired with a meaningful share of teacher interaction (one oral-assessment tool found best results with a 60% AI to 40% teacher-interaction ratio), rather than students using AI entirely on their own.3,12,13

What to do with this

Since the sources treat AI as a set of practical tools rather than defining the concept itself, the useful takeaway for an English learner is how to use these tools well: use AI chatbots or apps for extra writing feedback (grammar, structure, brainstorming), for low-pressure speaking/pronunciation practice, and for simulating conversations, but don't rely on AI alone — pairing it with a teacher or tutor for feedback and guidance tends to produce better results than using AI in isolation. If using AI outside class for extra practice, treat it as a motivation and enjoyment booster as much as a skills tool, and be aware that feeling anxious or overwhelmed by AI tools is common and can itself get in the way of learning, so it helps to start with simple, low-stakes tasks (like a short daily chat) rather than complex AI workflows.

Now pick something to do it with

Each of these opens an overview of the apps, courses and immersion material worth a look for that — filtered to exactly what the advice above points you at:

Or see the full resource list

Worth knowing

  • The question "What is AI?
  • " as posed isn't really answerable from these sources — they are all applied studies on AI in language education, not explanations of what artificial intelligence is technically or conceptually.
  • So this report reinterprets the question as "what does AI do for English learners," which is what the evidence actually supports.
  • Most of the underlying studies are correlational surveys (structural equation modeling of motivation, enjoyment, engagement) rather than controlled experiments, so claims about AI "causing" enjoyment or motivation should be read as associations, not proven cause-and-effect — several authors explicitly flag this themselves.
  • Many studies come from specific contexts (Chinese, Saudi, Pakistani, or Taiwanese EFL learners), so findings may not generalize evenly to all English learners.

Want a deeper literature dive?

There’s enough published research here to go wider than the usual pass. Available on the Pro plan.

See plans

  1. [1]Haomin Tommy Li, Ping Yan. Reconsidering the role of L2 self-motivational and affective factors in AI-mediated informal digital learning of English: a mixed-methods study. Frontiers in Psychology 2026. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1696171
  2. [2]Eva Fachriyah, Rizal Fauzi, Ratu Dea Mada Badriyah, Erma Perwitasari. AI Chatbots in ELT: A systematic review of pedagogical use and challenges in higher education. English Learning Innovation 2026. doi.org/10.22219/englie.v7i1.41639
  3. [3]Zhongjie Li. Bridging pedagogy and technology: a generative AI and IoT approach to transformative English language education. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications 2025. doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06151-6
  4. [4]Petra Poláková, Blanka Klímová. Implementation of AI-driven technology into education – a pilot study on the use of chatbots in foreign language learning. Cogent Education 2024. doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2355385
  5. [5]M. Zou, H. Reinders, Faisal Amjad. Understanding the potential role of GenAI-mediated informal digital learning of English (GenAI-IDLE) in the Global South: AI literacy, emotions, and willingness to communicate as outcomes. ReCALL 2025. doi.org/10.1017/S0958344025100360
  6. [6]Guangxiang Liu, Ron Darvin, Chaojun Ma. Exploring AI-mediated informal digital learning of English (AI-IDLE): a mixed-method investigation of Chinese EFL learners’ AI adoption and experiences. Computer Assisted Language Learning 2024. doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2310288
  7. [7]Juan Escalante, Austin Pack, Alex Barrett. AI-generated feedback on writing: insights into efficacy and ENL student preference. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 2023. doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00425-2
  8. [8]Mengdi Li, Yinyu Wang, Xiaorong Yang. Can Generative <scp>AI</scp> Chatbots Promote Second Language Acquisition? A Meta‐Analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2025. doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70060
  9. [9]Fenglin Jia, Daner Sun, Qing Ma, C. Looi. Developing an AI-Based Learning System for L2 Learners’ Authentic and Ubiquitous Learning in English Language. Sustainability 2022. doi.org/10.3390/su142315527
  10. [10]G. Liu, M. Zou, Ali Soyoof, M. Chiu. Untangling the Relationship Between AI‐Mediated Informal Digital Learning of English (AI‐IDLE), foreign Language Enjoyment and the Ideal L2 Self: Evidence From Chinese University EFL Students. European Journal of Education 2024. doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12846
  11. [11]Yasir Ahmed Ali, Muhammad Mooneeb Ali, Wael Alharbi, Shazia Hamid, Saira Abbas. The Influence of ChatGPT on English Grammar Among Saudi ESL Learners. Arab World English Journal 2025. doi.org/10.24093/awej/ai.21
  12. [12]Bradley Irwin, Theron Muller. Positioning Generative AI in EFL Peer Feedback: Training Feedback Literacy and Enabling Uptake in Speaking Classes. Education Sciences 2026. doi.org/10.3390/educsci16040544
  13. [13]Yan Li, T. Chiu. The mediating effects of needs satisfaction on the relationship between teacher support and student engagement with generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots from a self-determination theory (SDT) perspective. Education and Information Technologies : Official Journal of the IFIP technical committee on Education 2025. doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13574-w