LearnAnyLanguage.com

What are the most frequent grammatical errors in written Turkish produced by adult L2 learners?

Evidence-based answer · Last updated · How it’s made

The short answer

Across studies of adult learners writing in Turkish, spelling/orthography and morphological (word-ending) errors are consistently the most common problem, outranking sentence-structure (syntax) and vocabulary errors. Within morphology, case suffixes (like the accusative "-i" or locative "-de"), possessive endings, vowel harmony, and gerund/participle endings used to link clauses are the specific trouble spots, with error rates rising as the target structures get more complex or less similar to the learner's first language.

Answered for language learning in general. No specific language was set for this question, so the findings are drawn from general second-language research rather than one language’s literature.

Spelling and morphology top the error list

A systematic review of 16 studies on written Turkish produced by foreign adult learners found spelling/punctuation errors were most frequent (40%), followed by grammatical errors (34%), then vocabulary errors (14%) and sentence-structure errors (12%).2

Morphology overtakes syntax as the main grammar problem

In a comparison of Turkish learners studying inside versus outside Turkey, spelling errors were most frequent overall, but among grammar-related errors, mistakes in word endings (morphological errors, about 32-53% of grammar errors depending on group) clearly outnumbered sentence-structure/word-order errors (about 12-16%).3

In plain terms

Morphological errors are mistakes in how a word is built up with prefixes or suffixes (for example, using the wrong ending to mark 'to the house' versus 'in the house'), as opposed to syntax errors, which are mistakes in how whole sentences or clauses are ordered.

Case, person, and possessive suffixes are the biggest morphological trouble spots

Within word-ending errors, learners most often mis-produce case suffixes (which mark grammatical roles like object or location), person markers, and possessive markers, a pattern reported consistently across several studies of Turkish learners' writing.3

Word order errors dominate simple-sentence syntax mistakes

When sentence-structure errors do occur, the single most frequent type is incorrect word order in simple sentences, found in both learners studying in Turkey and those studying abroad.3

Specific high-frequency error types identified in a large cross-cultural corpus

A detailed error-frequency analysis of learner writing found that, after letter/spelling errors, the most common grammar-related error categories were problems forming noun phrases, adding unnecessary extra suffixes, misusing the accusative case suffix ('-i'), misusing possessive suffixes, misusing the locative case suffix ('-de'), vowel harmony mistakes, and misusing the dative case suffix ('-e').5

In plain terms

Vowel harmony is a rule in Turkish where the vowels in suffixes must match the vowels already in the word (for example, choosing between '-de' and '-da' depending on the preceding vowel); getting this wrong is one recurring mistake type.

Gerund and participle connectors are a persistent weak point for Arabic-speaking learners

Among Arab learners of Turkish at an advanced (C1) level, gerunds and gerund-like connector suffixes that join clauses together (used to express ideas like 'in order to,' 'while,' or 'when') were used frequently, but certain less-common ones — such as '-(y)IncA' ('as soon as/when'), '-mAsI için' ('in order to'), '-DIğI zaman' ('when'), and '-mAdAn önce' ('before') — had notably higher error rates than the most-practiced ones.1

In plain terms

A gerund/gerundial formation in Turkish is a suffix attached to a verb that turns it into something like an adverb or connector clause, letting a sentence say things such as 'having done X' or 'while doing X' without using a separate conjunction word. Learners at C1 are advanced, roughly one level below full fluency.

Errors partly driven by differences between Turkish and the learner's first language

Researchers attribute many of these frequent morphological and connector-suffix errors to structural differences between Turkish and learners' native languages, such as Arabic's different sentence structure, clause-linking patterns, and its gender/number agreement system, which Turkish gerund suffixes do not need to track in the same way.1

Valency errors persist even as proficiency rises

A separate study found that learners of Turkish continue to make errors with verb valency — that is, which case-marked nouns a given verb requires (for example whether a verb needs its object in the dative or accusative form) — even as their overall proficiency improves, and this error type does not resolve on its own without targeted teaching.4

In plain terms

Valency refers to how many and what type of grammatical partners (like a direct object or an indirect object marked with a specific suffix) a verb needs to make a complete sentence; getting the wrong suffix on the noun that goes with a verb is a valency error.

What to do with this

Given that spelling and word-ending (morphological) accuracy — not sentence structure — are the biggest stumbling blocks in written Turkish, learners should prioritize targeted practice on case suffixes (accusative, dative, locative), possessive and person markers, and vowel harmony rules, ideally through dictation and writing practice that gets corrected suffix-by-suffix rather than only at the whole-sentence level. Learners whose first language differs structurally from Turkish (such as Arabic speakers) should pay particular attention to the less-common gerund and clause-connector suffixes (like '-(y)IncA', '-mAsI için', '-DIğI zaman', '-mAdAn önce'), since these show disproportionately higher error rates even at advanced levels; explicit grammar lessons and focused sentence mining of these specific patterns from real texts may help. Because verb valency (which suffix a given verb requires on its object) does not seem to self-correct with general exposure, structured lessons or tutoring that specifically drill verb-suffix pairings appear useful.

Now pick something to do it with

Each of these opens an overview of the apps, courses and immersion material worth a look for that — filtered to exactly what the advice above points you at:

Or see the full resource list

Worth knowing

  • Most of these findings come from error-analysis studies of learners in specific programs (often Arabic-, Persian-, or otherwise-background learners at particular proficiency levels, mainly intermediate to advanced), rather than a single unified corpus representative of all adult Turkish learners, so exact rankings and percentages vary somewhat between studies and should be read as recurring patterns rather than one definitive list.
  • Several sources use different classification schemes for what counts as a "grammatical" versus "spelling" or "syntax" error, which affects how figures compare across studies.
  • The 1997 transitivity study and one systematic review's underlying primary studies are older or narrower in scope, and some sources in the set (on Indonesian, Spanish, or English as foreign languages) were excluded from the findings above because they do not concern written Turkish.

Want a deeper literature dive?

There’s enough published research here to go wider than the usual pass. Available on the Pro plan.

See plans

  1. [1]Salih Kürşad Dolunay, Hüseyin Karabuğa. Use of gerunds and gerundial formations in written expressions of Arab learners of Turkish as a foreign language in C1 level. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi 2020. doi.org/10.17263/jlls.851012
  2. [2]Funda UZDU YILDIZ, Betül Çetin. Errors in written expressions of learners of Turkish as a foreign language: A systematic review. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 2020. doi.org/10.17263/jlls.759261
  3. [3]Lebriz Sönmez, Meral Şeker. Investigating Syntactic and Morphological Differences in the Written Productions of Turkish Learners Based on the Learning Context. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi 2024. doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1473587
  4. [4]Seda Kaya, Halit Karatay. Technology-Supported Instruction for Reducing Valency Errors in Teaching Turkish as a Foreign Language: A Mixed-Methods Intervention Study. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2026. doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.1867396
  5. [5]Ozlem Ozan, Yasin Ozarslan, Sevgi Calisir Zenci. Towards an Adaptive Language MOOC: Examining Differences of Language Error Patterns across Cultural Domains. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 2025. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1466291