LearnAnyLanguage.com

What are passive-causative structures?

Evidence-based answer · Last updated · How it’s made

The short answer

"Passive-causative" structures are sentences that combine a language's causative marking (making someone do something) with its passive marking (something being done to someone) on the same verb, often producing a meaning where the person forced to do something is presented as the affected party — as in "Taro was made to run" rather than "someone made Taro run. " They are best documented in Japanese and Korean, where a single verb can carry both a causative suffix and a passive suffix, but similar interactions between causative and passive marking occur cross-linguistically, including in English, Chinese, French, Bantu languages, and others.

Answered for language learning in general. No specific language was set for this question, so the findings are drawn from general second-language research rather than one language’s literature.

Definition: stacking causative and passive marking

A passive-causative (also called causative-passive) is a verb form in which causative morphology (marking that someone caused an event) and passive morphology (marking that the subject was affected rather than acting) are combined on a single predicate, producing a construction where the person who was caused to do something is also grammatically demoted, as if something was done to them.3,7,12,14

In plain terms

Causative marking shows that one person made another do something (like turning 'run' into 'make run'). Passive marking shows that the subject of the sentence is the one affected by an action rather than doing it (like turning 'she opened the door' into 'the door was opened'). A passive-causative puts both of these onto the same verb.

Best-studied in Japanese and Korean

The clearest and most intensively studied examples of passive-causative structures come from Japanese and Korean, where the causative suffix (Japanese -sase) and the passive suffix (Japanese -rare) can be layered on the same verb stem, and Korean shows related causative-passive correlations with shared verbal morphology.1,3,6,7,14

Causative-passives often carry an 'adversity' or unwillingness reading

When causative and passive marking combine in Japanese, the resulting sentence typically conveys that the person who was made to do something experienced it as unwelcome or imposed on them, and this reading is described as marginal or degraded when the person forced to act is a willing or highly agentive participant.3

Example

An example pattern is 'Taro-was-made-to-run' where the sentence implies Taro was forced to run against his wishes, rather than simply describing a neutral fact that he ran because someone told him to.

Passive and causative share morphology in many languages

It is common cross-linguistically for the same piece of morphology (the same affix or particle) to be used for both passive and causative meaning in a given language, which is one reason the two constructions get studied together; this is documented for Korean, Manchu, Evenki, and Even, among others, and similar syncretism patterns are found in unrelated language families.3,6,11

Nested causative-passive constructions pose analysis challenges

When passive and causative suffixes are nested together in a single Japanese verb (causative plus passive, or passive plus causative in sequence), standard automated language-processing tools and even some published grammatical treebanks make incorrect predictions about what the sentence means, showing that these nested constructions are genuinely complex to formalize correctly.7

Passive-causative interactions occur beyond Japanese/Korean

Related causative-passive correlations and interactions are also documented outside Japanese and Korean, including in Chinese, English, French, and Bantu languages such as Lubukusu and Tshiluba, where causative markers combine with passive markers on the same verb and interact with the language's argument structure.8,13,15,16

What to do with this

These sources are technical linguistics literature rather than language-learning guides, so the practical takeaway is mainly conceptual: if you are learning a language like Japanese or Korean, expect to encounter verb forms where a causative suffix and a passive suffix are stacked together, and expect these forms to often carry a connotation of being forced or inconvenienced (not just a neutral 'was made to do X'). When studying grammar, it can help to isolate the causative and passive pieces separately first, and then practice recognizing them combined, since even automated language tools struggle with these nested forms, which suggests learners should not expect them to be simple or perfectly regular either.

Now pick something to do it with

Our resource list is an overview of the apps, courses and immersion material worth a look, whatever you're working on.

See our resources

Worth knowing

  • The provided sources are academic linguistics papers analyzing the grammatical structure (syntax and morphology) of passive-causative constructions in various languages, not language-teaching materials — so this report describes what these structures are and how they behave grammatically, not how to teach or drill them as a learner.
  • Most of the detailed evidence concerns Japanese and Korean, with additional but thinner coverage of English, Chinese, French, Bantu languages, and a few others, so claims about how universal or rare these patterns are across all human languages should be read cautiously.
  • Several sources are highly technical theoretical syntax papers (using formal notations like theta-roles or Voice heads), and some fine details there are simplified here for a general reader.

Want a deeper literature dive?

There’s enough published research here to go wider than the usual pass. Available on the Pro plan.

See plans

  1. [1]Stanley Dubinsky. Predicate union and the syntax of Japanese passives. Journal of Linguistics 1997. doi.org/10.1017/s0022226796006287
  2. [2]Beatrice Santorini, Caroline Heycock. Remarks on Causatives and Passive. ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) 1988. https://repository.upenn.edu/cis_reports/614
  3. [3]Hiroshi Aoyagi. On the causative and passive morphology in Japanese and Korean. Open Linguistics 2021. doi.org/10.1515/opli-2021-0004
  4. [4]Masaki Yasuhara. The Isomorphism between Passives and Anti-causatives in Japanese: A Comparative Study of the Causative Alternation. 2016. doi.org/10.15860/SIGG.26.2.201605.143
  5. [5]Hiroto Hoshi. Passive, Causative, and Light Verbs: a Study on Theta Role Assignment. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 1998. doi.org/10.1515/jjl-1998-0109
  6. [6]Jaehoon Yeon. The Korean Causative-Passive Correlation Revisited. Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) 1991. http://hdl.handle.net/10371/85924
  7. [7]D. Bekki, Hitomi Yanaka. Is Japanese CCGBank empirically correct? A case study of passive and causative constructions. International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories 2023. doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.14708
  8. [8]Xiaoshi Hu. Syntax of causative-passive correlation from a cross-linguistic perspective. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 2020. doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.00007.hu
  9. [9]Άρτεμις Αλεξιάδου, Elena Anagnostopoulou, Florian Schäfer. External Arguments in Transitivity Alternations: A Layering Approach. 2015. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB1773885X
  10. [10]Άρτεμις Αλεξιάδου, Elena Anagnostopoulou, Florian Schäfer. The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. 2006. doi.org/10.1515/9783110197723.4.187
  11. [11]Despina Oikonomou, Άρτεμις Αλεξιάδου. Voice Syncretism Crosslinguistically: The View from Minimalism. Philosophies 2022. doi.org/10.3390/philosophies7010019
  12. [12]C. Kitagawa. Mechanisms of productivity in word formation: Transitivity alternations in Japanese. Glossa 2021. doi.org/10.5334/GJGL.1304
  13. [13]Кожокина Ангелина Викторовна. СТРУКТУРА КАТЕГОРИИ КАУЗАТИВНОСТИ В ПАССИВНОЙ КОНСТРУКЦИИ (НА МАТЕРИАЛЕ АНАЛИЗА АНГЛИЙСКИХ ГЛАГОЛОВ TO CAUSE И TO MAKE). Historical and social-educational ideas 2016. doi.org/10.17748/2075-9908-2015-7-7/2-231-234
  14. [14]Natsuko Tsujimura. An Introduction to Japanese Linguistics. 1996. doi.org/10.2307/417343
  15. [15]Kyle Jerro. Ingestive Verbs, Causatives, and Object Symmetry in Lubukusu. Linguistic Inquiry 2018. doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00297
  16. [16]Christiana Moser. morphosyntax of causatives and applicatives in Tshiluba. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 2023. doi.org/10.33137/twpl.v46i1.39256