LearnAnyLanguage.com

Has there been a lot of research on how L3 learners acquire sociolinguistic variation or sociolinguistic competence, especially in comparison to L2 learners?

Evidence-based answer · Last updated · How it’s made

The short answer

The vast majority of research on how learners acquire sociolinguistic variation (things like knowing when to use a formal vs. informal form, or a dialect vs. standard variant) focuses on second-language (L2) learners — there is a large, decades-old body of "variationist SLA" work covering Spanish, French, German, and other languages. Research specifically on third-language (L3) learners' sociolinguistic competence is essentially absent from the provided sources; the L3-focused studies here concentrate almost entirely on other topics, mainly cross-linguistic influence (transfer) in grammar, vocabulary, and pragmatics — not on how L3 learners develop sociolinguistic variation or style-shifting.

Answered for language learning in general. No specific language was set for this question, so the findings are drawn from general second-language research rather than one language’s literature.

L2 sociolinguistic variation is a well-established research field

Variationist research on L2 sociolinguistic competence goes back to the mid-1970s and has grown into a substantial, methodologically sophisticated field, covering learners of French, Spanish, German, English, and other languages, with studies on features like pronoun use, mood selection, dialect variants, and stylistic shifting.1,2,3,4,10,11,14,15

Study abroad is the dominant context studied for L2 sociolinguistic development

Many of the key studies on L2 acquisition of sociolinguistic variation come from study-abroad contexts, examining how immersion, contact with native speakers, and social networks shape learners' uptake of native-like variable forms (dialect features, informal speech patterns, style shifting).6,7,12,14,15,16,18

L2 research spans many specific languages and features, but L3 does not appear in this literature

The provided L2 sociolinguistic-variation studies cover a wide range of specific languages and features (Spanish copula and subjunctive use, French pronoun and consonant deletion, German dialect/standard switching, Korean-background learners of Spanish, addressee-dependent style shifts using virtual reality, romantic-relationship effects on variety use), but none of these studies involve L3 learners as their focus.1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20

L3 acquisition research exists but centers on cross-linguistic transfer, not sociolinguistic variation

The sources on third-language (L3) acquisition are substantial in number but focus almost entirely on cross-linguistic influence — how a learner's first and second languages affect grammar, vocabulary, and pragmatic transfer (refusal strategies, lexical borrowing) in the third language — rather than on sociolinguistic competence or variation such as style-shifting or register control.21,22,23,24,25,26,27

In plain terms

Cross-linguistic influence (also called transfer) means the effect that languages a person already knows have on how they use a new language they're learning — for example, an L3 English learner might borrow a word or sentence pattern from their L1 or L2 without meaning to.

One L3 book touches pragmatic competence but not variationist sociolinguistics

Among the L3 sources, one book on third-language learners does address 'pragmatic competence' (how learners use language appropriately in social situations) and touches on sociolinguistic context, but this is framed around pragmatics and instruction effects rather than the variationist study of sociolinguistic variation that dominates the L2 literature.5

In plain terms

Pragmatic competence refers to knowing how to use language appropriately for a given social situation (how polite or direct to be), which is related to but distinct from sociolinguistic competence in the variationist sense — the latter is specifically about systematically varying between alternative linguistic forms (like two ways of saying 'you') depending on social context.

No direct L3-vs-L2 comparative studies of sociolinguistic competence found

None of the provided sources directly compare L3 learners to L2 learners in their acquisition of sociolinguistic variation or sociolinguistic competence; the comparative angle the question asks about is not addressed by any single study here.1,2,3,4,21

What to do with this

If your interest is understanding how learners come to use sociolinguistically appropriate language (dialect forms, formal/informal registers, style-shifting), the strongest and most detailed evidence available concerns L2 learners, particularly through study-abroad immersion, social network strength, and interlocutor effects — these are good entry points for practical resources on developing this kind of competence. If you are specifically interested in L3 (third-language) learners, be aware that the available literature on L3 acquisition emphasizes cross-linguistic transfer of grammar and vocabulary rather than sociolinguistic variation, so learners or researchers looking for L3-specific sociolinguistic guidance will need to extrapolate cautiously from the L2 findings rather than relying on direct L3 evidence.

Now pick something to do it with

Each of these opens an overview of the apps, courses and immersion material worth a look for that — filtered to exactly what the advice above points you at:

Or see the full resource list

Worth knowing

  • The sources provided do not include any study that directly investigates L3 learners' acquisition of sociolinguistic variation, nor any study that explicitly compares L3 to L2 learners on this dimension.
  • The L3-related sources here focus on a different subfield (cross-linguistic transfer in grammar, vocabulary, and pragmatics), so the conclusion that L3 sociolinguistic-competence research is comparatively scarce is based on the absence of such studies in this source set rather than a direct statement from any source confirming a research gap between the two areas.
  • It's possible that L3 sociolinguistic variation research exists elsewhere but simply wasn't included among these sources.

Want a deeper literature dive?

There’s enough published research here to go wider than the usual pass. Available on the Pro plan.

See plans

  1. [1]Aarnes Gudmestad, Matthew Kanwit. Reconsidering the Social in Language Learning: A State of the Science and an Agenda for Future Research in Variationist SLA. Languages 2025. doi.org/10.3390/languages10040064
  2. [2]Robert Bayley, Dennis R. Preston, Xiaoshi Li. Variation in Second and Heritage Languages. John Benjamins Publishing Company 2022. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=sK53EAAAQBAJ&source=gbs_api
  3. [3]Martin Howard, Raymond Mougeon, Jean‐Marc Dewaele. Sociolinguistics and Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press eBooks 2013. doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199744084.013.0017
  4. [4]Kimberly L. Geeslin. Variation in L2 Spanish: The State of the Discipline. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 2011. doi.org/10.1515/shll-2011-1110
  5. [5]M. Jordà. Third Language Learners. 2005. doi.org/10.21832/9781853598043
  6. [6]Francisco Salgado-Robles. The acquisition of sociolinguistic variation by learners of Spanish in a study abroad context. ProQuest LLC eBooks 2011. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/tesis?codigo=283265
  7. [7]Francisco Salgado-Robles, Carlos Enrique Ibarra. “Les voy a echar de menos cuando regrese a los Estados Unidos”: adquisición de la variación dialectal por aprendientes de español en un contexto de inmersión. Ogigia 2012. http://www.ogigia.es/OGIGIA11_files/SALGADO-ROBLES_IBARRA.pdf
  8. [8]Mason A. Wirtz, Simone E. Pfenninger, Irmtraud Kaiser, Andrea Ender. Sociolinguistic competence and varietal repertoires in a second language: A study on addressee‐dependent varietal behavior using virtual reality. The Modern Language Journal 2024. doi.org/10.1111/modl.12918
  9. [9]Mason A. Wirtz, S. Pfenninger. Signature Dynamics of Development in Second Language Sociolinguistic Competence: Evidence From an Intensive Microlongitudinal Study. Language Learning 2024. doi.org/10.1111/lang.12634
  10. [10]Aarnes Gudmestad. Acquiring a Variable Structure: An Interlanguage Analysis of Second Language Mood Use in Spanish. Language Learning 2012. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00696.x
  11. [11]Martin Howard, Isabelle Lemée, Vera Regan. The L2 acquisition of a phonological variable: the case of /l/ deletion in French. Journal of French Language Studies 2006. doi.org/10.1017/s0959269506002298
  12. [12]Vera Regan. Sociolinguistics and Language Learning in a Study Abroad Context. Frontiers The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad 1998. doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v4i1.63
  13. [13]Kimberly L. Geeslin, Pedro Guijarro‐Fuentes. Second Language Acquisition of Variable Structures in Spanish by Portuguese Speakers. Language Learning 2006. doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2006.00342.x
  14. [14]Kristen Kennedy Terry. Beyond the Classroom Walls: Study Abroad and the Acquisition of Sociostylistic Variation in L2 French. Languages 2025. doi.org/10.3390/languages10100264
  15. [15]Kennedy Terry, Kristen M.. At the Intersection of SLA and Sociolinguistics: The Predictive Power of Social Networks during Study Abroad. Modern Language Journal 2022. doi.org/10.1111/modl.12763
  16. [16]Mark Alan Black. Interlocutor Effects on Sociolinguistic Variation in L2 French. ProQuest LLC 2021. http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:28317654
  17. [17]Long, Avizia Yim. The Acquisition of Sociolinguistic Competence by Korean Learners of Spanish: Development and Use of the Copula, Subject Expression, and Intervocalic Stops. ProQuest LLC 2016. http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:10129681
  18. [18]Devin Grammon. Language classrooms as communicative settings for learners’ development of sociolinguistic competence during study abroad. The Modern Language Journal 2025. doi.org/10.1111/modl.12990
  19. [19]Rémi A. van Compernolle. Constructing a Second Language Sociolinguistic Repertoire: A Sociocultural Usage-based Perspective. Applied Linguistics 2018. doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy033
  20. [20]Mason A. Wirtz. The love factor in variationist SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2025. doi.org/10.1017/s0272263125101320
  21. [21]Najmeh Dehghanitafti. A Meta-Analysis on the Acquisition of Morphosyntactic Language Transfer Models in Third Language Acquisition. ProQuest LLC 2024. https://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:31142041
  22. [22]Qingling Yu, Q P Li. Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: evidence from refusal strategies of Uyghur–Mandarin–English trilinguals. International Journal of Multilingualism 2025. doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2025.2470467
  23. [23]Lorenz, Eliane, Hasai, Yevheniia, Siemund, Peter. Multilingual Lexical Transfer Challenges Monolingual Educational Norms: Not Quite!. Multilingua: Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 2021. doi.org/10.1515/multi-2021-0014
  24. [24]Westergaard, Marit. Microvariation in Multilingual Situations: The Importance of Property-by-Property Acquisition. Second Language Research 2021. doi.org/10.1177/0267658319884116
  25. [25]Jasone Cenoz, Ulrike Jessner. English in Europe : the acquisition of a third language. 2000. http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=008875434&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
  26. [26]Athmani, Fatima Zohra, Boukhedimi, Yasmine. Exploring Psychotypology as an Affective Factor of Cross-Linguistic Influence: Case of Algerian Multilingual Learners. Arab World English Journal 2021. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1323983
  27. [27]Efeoglu, Gulumser, Yüksel, H. Gülru, Baran, Suat. Lexical Cross-Linguistic Influence: A Study of Three Multilingual Learners of L3 English. International Journal of Multilingualism 2020. doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1620239