LearnAnyLanguage.com

Does Persian have particular aspects that are especially difficult?

Evidence-based answer ยท Last updated ยท How itโ€™s made

The short answer

Most of the sources here study Persian-speakers learning English rather than English-speakers learning Persian, but by looking at where the two languages' grammars, sounds, and writing systems clash, they still point to specific trouble spots an English speaker learning Persian is likely to hit: consonant clusters and syllable shape, articles/definiteness marking, relative clauses and word order, prepositions, and the Persian-Arabic script. There isn't a source that directly tests English speakers learning Persian, so this answer works by inference from contrastive-analysis studies โ€” real but indirect evidence.

Asked as someone learning Persian (beta). Findings drawn from Persian-specific research are framed for Persian learners and may not hold for other languages; where the evidence is general second-language research, the report says so.

Persian has a thinner research base than our core languages, so this answer may lean on general second-language findings.

Consonant clusters differ sharply in shape

Persian syllables only allow one consonant at the start and at most two at the end, while English allows much bigger consonant clusters at both the start and end of syllables (like the 'str' in 'strengths'). This mismatch is documented as a major source of difficulty for Persian speakers learning English, and because the mismatch is symmetrical, it implies English speakers learning Persian would need to get used to a syllable system that is simpler in some ways but has different rules for where consonants can and can't cluster.6,10

In plain terms

A 'consonant cluster' is just a group of consonant sounds bunched together with no vowel between them, like the 'str' in 'street'. A 'syllable onset' is the part of a syllable before the vowel, and a 'coda' is the part after it.

Example

An English speaker used to words like 'strengths' or 'twelfths' will find that Persian syllables never start with more than one consonant and never end with more than two, so getting comfortable with Persian's stricter syllable shapes โ€” and not over-adding sounds that aren't there โ€” is a real, learnable adjustment.

Definiteness and articles work very differently

English marks 'the' vs 'a' mainly through grammar (syntax), while Persian expresses similar distinctions mostly through meaning and context (semantics) and different marking strategies, such as suffixes for specificity rather than a direct equivalent of 'the'. This deep structural difference is repeatedly shown to be one of the hardest things for Persian speakers to master in English, and it cuts both ways: an English speaker learning Persian cannot simply map 'the' and 'a' onto Persian equivalents one-to-one.1,3

In plain terms

'Definiteness' is the grammatical distinction between talking about a specific, known thing ('the dog') versus any one of a general category ('a dog'). 'Specificity' is a related but separate idea about whether the speaker has a particular individual in mind, even when using an indefinite phrase.

Example

An English speaker might expect a direct word-for-word equivalent of 'the' in Persian, but instead has to learn to read context and sometimes use a specificity suffix, which does not line up neatly with English 'the/a' usage โ€” so direct translation of articles will frequently go wrong in both directions.

Relative clauses trigger a different strategy

Persian allows a 'resumptive pronoun' strategy in relative clauses (roughly, restating the noun with a pronoun inside the clause) in places where English requires leaving a silent gap instead, and Persian question-like structures stay in place ('wh-in-situ') rather than moving to the front the way English does. Studies of Persian speakers learning English show this leads to a lasting preference for resumptive-style patterns even at advanced levels, driven more by real-time processing difficulty than by not knowing the rule.9,12

In plain terms

A 'relative clause' is a clause that describes a noun, like 'the book that I read'. In English, the described noun leaves a 'gap' where it would normally sit ('I read ___'), but some languages instead leave a pronoun there ('the book that I read it'), which is the 'resumptive' strategy. 'Wh-in-situ' means a question word like 'what' stays in its normal sentence position instead of moving to the front, as it does in English 'What did you read?'.

Example

An English speaker learning Persian will encounter sentences describing people or things where Persian's grammar permits, or even favors, a pronoun placeholder inside the clause and leaves question words in place rather than fronting them โ€” a genuine structural difference to get used to, not just a vocabulary difference.

Prepositions rarely map one-to-one with English

Persian and English prepositions frequently diverge in ways that cause errors when moving between the languages โ€” some Persian prepositions correspond to more than one English preposition and vice versa, some English prepositions attach to specific verbs with no predictable Persian counterpart, and there are also word-order differences (Persian has some postpositions and object markers that come after the noun, unlike English).4,8

Example

Just as an English speaker studying Persian might struggle to guess which single preposition covers a given situation (since one English preposition like 'with' can correspond to more than one Persian option depending on meaning), the reverse direction shows the same kind of mismatch is systematic rather than occasional, so prepositions are worth deliberately studying as a category rather than picking up by feel alone.

Persian's script is a regular but unfamiliar writing system

Persian is written in a modified Arabic script, read right-to-left, and research on Persian orthography argues its script has distinctive properties that shape how quickly reading skills develop, comparing it to how English's own famously irregular spelling affects reading development. Persian's letter-to-sound correspondence for basic reading is described as more regular than English's, though vowel marks are often left out of standard adult text, which is its own separate hurdle for a new reader.2,5

In plain terms

'Orthography' just means a language's spelling/writing system โ€” how sounds are represented by written symbols.

Example

An English speaker learning Persian faces two separate challenges bundled into 'the script': first learning an entirely new alphabet that connects letters to sounds fairly consistently, and then coping with texts that typically omit short vowel marks, meaning a reader often has to infer vowels from context and vocabulary knowledge the way one might guess a partly-blanked-out English word.

Compound words follow a different internal order

Persian noun-noun compound words can be built with the 'head' (the main word that carries the core meaning) either first or last, and research shows the more common, easier-to-process pattern for Persian speakers is when the head comes last (head-final), with head-first compounds being processed more slowly and linked to a special connective element ('ezafe') in Persian compounding.7

In plain terms

A 'compound word' is a word made of two smaller words combined, like 'toothbrush'. The 'head' of a compound is the part that determines what kind of thing it fundamentally is โ€” in 'toothbrush', 'brush' is the head because a toothbrush is a kind of brush.

Example

English speakers are used to compounds like 'toothbrush' where the head sits at the end; the Persian findings suggest that while head-final ordering is also the natural/default pattern in Persian, learners will still need to get comfortable with the ezafe connector and with compounds that reverse this order, since those are read and recalled more slowly even by native speakers.

Grammar complexity affects which study method helps most

Research comparing how Persian-speaking English learners best acquire different grammar features found that exposure-based learning (seeing lots of correct examples) works better for smaller, word-level grammar features (like verb tense endings), while practice-based learning (actively producing sentences) works better for complex sentence-level structures (like relative clauses). One related study also suggested that grammar points where Persian and English are structurally more similar may respond especially well to active-practice methods.11,13

Example

This suggests that when an English speaker is tackling a small, isolated Persian grammar point such as a verb ending, reading and listening to lots of correct examples may be enough, but for a bigger structural feature such as building a complex clause, actively producing and correcting one's own sentences is likely to pay off more.

What to do with this

Because most of the direct evidence here comes from Persian speakers learning English rather than the reverse, treat these as informed predictions about likely trouble spots rather than proven Persian-learning findings. Given the contrastive patterns found: (1) pay deliberate attention to Persian's syllable and consonant-cluster rules early on, since English speakers are used to different cluster patterns and may need focused listening and pronunciation practice rather than assuming clusters will transfer intuitively; (2) don't expect a direct one-to-one mapping between English 'a/the' and any single Persian marker โ€” build a feel for definiteness and specificity through lots of reading and listening rather than trying to translate the rule; (3) treat relative clauses and question structures as a distinct grammar topic worth explicit study, since Persian's structure (resumptive pronouns, in-place question words) differs from English at a deep level and may take deliberate, repeated exposure and production practice to become natural; (4) study prepositions as their own vocabulary-like category with example sentences rather than relying on direct translation from English; (5) budget real time for learning the script itself, including practicing reading text with vowel marks omitted, since that is a separate skill from learning to speak; (6) when tackling any specific grammar point, match your study method to its complexity โ€” lean on input (reading/listening to correct examples) for small word-level features and lean on active production (speaking/writing practice) for complex sentence-level structures.

Now pick something to do it with

Each of these opens an overview of the apps, courses and immersion material worth a look for that โ€” filtered to exactly what the advice above points you at:

Or see the full resource list

Worth knowing

  • Almost every source here studies Persian speakers learning English, not English speakers learning Persian โ€” so the difficulty points identified (clusters, articles, relative clauses, prepositions, script) are inferred by looking at the same contrastive gap from the other direction, and no source directly measures how hard these are for an English-speaking Persian learner in practice.
  • The article/definiteness and relative-clause studies also measure grammatical judgment or accuracy in controlled tests, which may not fully reflect real conversational difficulty.
  • Several studies have fairly small samples (dozens of learners at one or two universities in Iran), so findings may not generalize broadly.
  • Findings on compound words and heritage-speaker grammar come from narrow, specific dissertation-level studies and should be treated as suggestive rather than definitive.

Want a deeper literature dive?

Thereโ€™s enough published research here to go wider than the usual pass. Available on the Pro plan.

See plans

  1. [1]Marjansadat Momenzadeh, Manijeh Youhanaee. Reassembling Formal Features in Articles by L1 Persian Learners of L2 English. Applied Research on English Language 2015. http://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15502_83adc4f7c056f9635ba629282507cde9.pdf
  2. [2]Bahman Baluch. Persian orthography and its relation to literacy.. Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London) 2005. doi.org/10.4324/9780203824719.ch22
  3. [3]Geranpayeh, Ardeshir. The Acquisition of the English Article System by Persian Speakers.. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics 2000. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED453666
  4. [4]Masoud Mahmoodzadeh. A Cross-linguistic Study of Prepositions in Persian and English: The Effect of Transfer. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 2012. doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.4.734-740
  5. [5]Mitra Gholamain, Esther Geva. Orthographic and Cognitive Factors in the Concurrent Development of Basic ReadingSkills in English and Persian. Language Learning 1999. doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00087
  6. [6]Ali Akbar Jabbari, Leila Arghavan. Optimality Theoretic Account of Acquisition of Consonant Clusters of English Syllables by Persian EFL Learners. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning 2010. https://elt.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_627_0dac4cf7abc026a5fec949330fe22629.pdf
  7. [7]Ahmadi-Torshizi, Narges (Torshizi, Narcisse). The Structure and Processing of Persian Compound Words in the Mental Lexicon: Experimental Studies on Compound Word Processing in Persian. 2020. https://core.ac.uk/download/639177132.pdf
  8. [8]Seyedeh Sara Jafari. A Cross-linguistic Study of English and Persian Prepositions. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 2014. doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.3.689-697
  9. [9]Ehsan Solaimani, Florence Myles, Laurel Lawyer. Testing the Interpretability Hypothesis: Evidence from Acceptability Judgments of Relative Clauses by Persian and French Learners of L2 English. Second Language Research 2024. doi.org/10.1177/02676583231162783
  10. [10]Ali Akbar Jabbari, Fateme Pourmajnoun. The acquisition of onset Consonant Clusters by Persian Speakers (L1), Learners of English (L2) and French (L3): An optimality Account. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science 2016. doi.org/10.9790/0837-2109141321
  11. [11]Andrew Schenck. Learning How to Use Input-Based and Output-Based Form-Focused Instruction: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Persian EFL Learners. Journal of Second Language Acquisition and Teaching 2024. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1457419
  12. [12]Shooshtari, Zohreh Gooniband. Generative Syntactic Transfer in L2 and L3 Acquisition via the Channel of Translation. English Language Teaching 2009. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1082246
  13. [13]Andrew Schenck . Learning How to Use Input-Based and Output-Based Form-Focused Instruction: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Korean and Persian EFL Learners. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching 2024. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14790529